This is work for our Congressman and Congresswoman.
I believed 3 majors changes must be made in our namings process. 1st part we have Washington State, and Washington D. C. because redundances cannot be sitting in our States. Look at it this way State of Washington where our forefather was born have to be different from Federal Government is handling day to day activity for this grouping of States or FED’s could move to that state as the capital if one wants to maintain capital using Washington. I Ernst Bastien had previously stated that district is a no longer required therefore I proposed ” The Capital of Washington ” in order to resolve this redundance. It is solely to your ability to review calmly these changes.
2nd Part would be the 2 Virginia’s . Do not forget as of July 4, 2025 The Commonwealth of Virginia had regain its status as State of Virginia and therefore conflicting with West Virginia which was a State of The FED’s. So what I am trying to let everyone understood again is a clear redundance is showing in that naming. It would be adequate to use now one Virginia since there are no conflict of interest. If one would like to keep both state without reducing the original 52 States of The Federal Government then we would have to bring a new name without North and South,or East and West because any land has these already mentioned natural directives attach to it. That is why we have in a route we have directions.
3rd Part would have been North and South Dakota since there had never been any existing conflict of interest. But while crossing South Dakota I have noticed that The Dakota’s were ahead by having a singular higher education for both North an South. So if a situation of conjoint university is already in place by the people of 2 states I Ernst Bastien Prophet of THE LIGHTER can infer that both states can become one and will simply be named DAKOTA . In a case Congress do not want to loose a number into 52 States thus we will have to use Dakota for one and Takoda for the next. Just an example so we can avoid directives and redundances.
Please what is a number since I have been asking your to insert my land of birth into your “Lines of States” . I am not asking opportunity for all of them to immigrate into The United States rather opportunity for every Human Beings to live a descent life by avoiding hunger, neatness, and security needed to live its existence without confrontations . What about Canada Our President Mr Trump had viewed and intended to pulled them in as a State since their are descendants of Europeans like you guys are ? If you follow my writing here 52 will be maintained in conformity to our constitutions. Also I believed it is totally adequate to expand our sphere of market since a variety of our car makers are already into Canada. Where my land of birth is a virgin for business like yours to be open to American Market.
If any questions and answers may arise I will not hesitate to update